Disclaimer: This website or these products are not intended to diagnose or prescribe for medical, chiropractic or psychological conditions, nor to claim to prevent, treat, mitigate, or cure such conditions. They are not intended to recommend specific information, products, or services as treatment of disease or to provide diagnosis, care, treatment, or rehabilitation of individuals, or apply medical, mental health, or human development principles, to provide diagnosing, treating, operating, or prescribing for any human disease, pain, injury, deformity, or physical condition.

Potential benefits are recommended based upon traditional uses and may not be generally recognized as substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence. Any use of the techniques, education, information, herbal salves, and other products or services is based upon customer informed consent and private license. Results may vary depending upon use and commitment.


If you have any questions or comments concerning anything you read on this page, please email us.
Note that "Lab Notes" are posted by Alpha Omega researchers and none of its content
is intended to convey that any particular product can diagnose, treat, cure or prevent
any disease. All anecdotal information is preliminary. 

Lab Notes : H3O & Athlete's Foot
"My son, Jeff, 26 years old, has been plagued by chronic foot fungus infection for several years. I provided him with a 2.5 pH solution of H3O, which he sprayed on his feet following a morning shower. He also sprayed inside his work boot and tennis shoes. Within two weeks of the first application of H3O, the infection disappeared. He has been using the product since the Fall of 1996 and has relatively few problems with reoccurring athlete's foot infection."

Although not a focus of our work, or that of our associates, several dozen reports have been received by testers of H3O (from 1996 to 2001) claiming that H3O is very effective is the treatment of athlete's foot. Those who felt incline to do this kind of testing were those for whom conventional treatment was either ineffective, or did not prevent frequent recurrence. pH ranges were in the 2.0 to 2.5 for the majority. Some users were below 1.5, however, at this pH range, either stinging or an undesirable tingling were present. End user testings continues.